Friday, August 28, 2009

Impartial For Who?

In today's Examiner column, I further examine the problem with not abiding by the Tennessee Constitution where the selection of judges is concerned:

Constitutionally correct judicial elections were defeated in no small part because certain Justices of the Supreme Court spoke
out publicly against the election of judges. The reason for doing so, it was said, was to keep our judiciary "impartial."



At Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:15:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blah, blah, blah...just drop us a line on Franks' love child....will ya already?

At Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:26:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great, now you show that you have no grasp of this issue in two forums.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page
Profile Visitor Map - Click to view visits
Create your own visitor map