Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Democrats Will Never "Get It"

The New York Times and MSNBC show once again that they neither understand Catholic teaching nor Catholic voters in their latest so-called coverage of what they deem a "Catholic divide" on the issue. They did manage to cover one real Catholic and his dilemma:

Until recently, Matthew Figured, a Sunday school teacher at the Holy Rosary Roman Catholic Church here, could not decide which candidate to vote for in the presidential election.

He had watched progressive Catholics work with the Democratic Party over the last four years to remind the faithful of the party’s support for Catholic teaching on the Iraq war, immigration , health care and even reducing abortion rates.

But then his local bishop plunged into the fray, barring Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, from receiving communion in the area because of his support for abortion rights.


The Catechism of the Catholic Church makes it very clear that those who support abortion, either directly or indirectly, commit a grave offense:

2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:

You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish. 75

God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes. 76

2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. "A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae," 77 "by the very commission of the offense," 78 and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law. 79 The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.

2322 From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a "criminal" practice (GS 27 § 3), gravely contrary to the moral law. The Church imposes the canonical penalty of excommunication for this crime against human life.





In supporting aborticide, those public figures of both political parties who choose to defy the Church's teaching are accessories to the crime. The Church has made it abundantly clear that in the pantheon of social teaching and moral commandments, abortion stands at the very top of the list of things to be fought and opposed. Further, that any public figure who supports the continued legalization of abortion, no matter how they may try to mask this in their other politics, is not to be supported-period.

Contrary to what some may believe, there is no covert alliance between the U.S. Bishops and the Republican Party. No one in the Church hierarchy believes that GOP stands for "God's Own Party," nor do they think that a singular political party will press Catholic social teaching with the vigor that it deserves to be pressed. This has been a learned experience, as the Democratic Party failed the Church after many years of an informal and unwritten alliance.

The Democratic Party has chosen to walk down a path which simply excludes serious people of faith who cannot in good conscience support public figures who uphold the legalized murder of unborn children-and that is what it is. The Church does not endorse any political party, but unfortunately for the Democrats, they continue to take positions that put the Church at odds with them and make the Republicans the party of choice by default.

As usual, the Democratic Party does not care, which is why they stand to lose the votes of practicing, observant, Mass-going Catholics (who voted Republican at a rate of about 80% in 2004) yet again.

Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

At Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:18:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

David,
How many Catholics use birth control? How many get abortions? How many Evangelicals use birth control? How many get abortions? How many non-churched use birth control? How many get abortions? The numbers are about the same.
The simple fact is this issue is starting to be seen for what it is: An individual moral issue being falsly elevated to the National Level inorder to prevent conservatives from having to confront the failure of their ideology.
Abortion has been legal since '72. What has really happened since then? Nothing.
And nothing ever will. If something happened to overturn Roe Vs Wade Conservatives would lose the best wedge issue they've ever had, and ever will have. And they're not going to let that happen.

SteveMule

 
At Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:34:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

David,
Something else I was thinking about last night and this morning at work (I work midnight to 8AM, typically).
There is a major paradaigm difference between Catholics and non-catholics (& nonbelievers): You (Catholics) hold to the authority of Rome/Pope. We don't. That's why, I believe, it is so difficult for us to get the other. Quoting Roman Catechism to noncatholics is an excersise in futility. Non-Catholic Chrisitians grew up in the paradigm of Reformation - mostly the abject rejection of the authority of Rome and the Pope (theology too, BUT most nonCatholics don't really know their theology - which is why the "Left Behind" book series is so popular with Presbytarians, for example).
As a nonCatholic Christian the idea of letting someone else, anyone, decide for me what I will beleive, what I must believe is simply abbhorent. I struggle to grasp how anyone would/could allow that. On the other hand, I'm forced by sheer emperical fact that many, however, do. Nevertheless, I also have to wonder how many simply pay lip service to this authority. Others obviously do as well; even to the point of trying to find them.

SteveMule

 

Post a Comment

<< Home


Locations of visitors to this page
Profile Visitor Map - Click to view visits
Create your own visitor map