Monday, September 03, 2007
Ina Hughes' August 30th column in the Knoxville News-Sentinel decrying the fact that Mother Teresa's private correspondence was not destroyed per her wish was very well intentioned. I respectfully submit that Hughes is right in one regard and wrong in another-even if it is a well-meaning wrong.
Hughes is absolutely right that Rev. Father Brian Kolodiejchuk, Director of the Mother Teresa Center, should have respected Mother's wishes that her correspondence remain totally private and should not have published them (in fairness to Kolodiejchuk, he was the preserver of the letters because he is the postulator of Mother's cause for sainthood). This act, though it may have been meant to help strengthen the faith of others, violated Mother Teresa's expressed wish that she take her private doubts (which all of us who have faith have had at some point in our lives) with her to her grave. Publishing them in such a public way clearly violates Mother's intent.
However, there was a perfectly good reason why the letters should not, and could not have been destroyed: Mother Teresa's correspondence has been kept with us because the Church has need of them.
In her humility, Mother Teresa probably could not have envisioned that she might one day be publicly declared a saint-the highest honor that the Church on earth can bestow to one of its own. In a very real way, of course, all who enter heaven are saints. For the Church to publicly declare a person to be a saint is its way of recognizing the holy life that they lived, and declaring that it (the Catholic Church) believes beyond doubt that this person is in Heaven with God. For non-Catholics-think of it as the Holiness Hall of Fame, people the Church believed lived a Christian life worth emulating.
People began to demand almost immediately upon Mother Teresa's death that the Church issue a declaration of her sanctity. Because the popular appeal for this was so great, the late Pope John Paul II ordered that the process be expedited. That simply meant that the process of publicly placing someone on the Church's official role of saints was trimmed from possibly taking decades or even centuries to just taking a few years. Just because John Paul did this (Benedict XVI has done the same thing for John Paul's cause for sainthood), doesn't mean that the rules don't apply to Mother Teresa. One of the rules is that the Congregation for the Causes of Saints does a full investigation into the relevant person's life, hence the Vatican needed those letters preserved. Mother Teresa's fellow religious sisters doubtless knew that a cause for Mother's sainthood was going to come up in a hurry, so they did the right thing by the Church and by Mother (who would have wanted the Church to be obeyed) in preserving the letters. The letters are needed as long as Mother Teresa's cause for sainthood in the Catholic Church remains open.
The publication of the letters is another matter, however. This is something that the Congregation for the Causes of Saints would likely not have promoted. The Vatican is notoriously tight-lipped about the inquiries of that body precisely so that the privacy of candidates for sainthood can be preserved and their wishes respected as much as possible within Canon Law. Rev. Kolodiejchuk would have done better to leave the investigation of the letters up to the relevant bodies of Church authority and leave all decisions as to their future after the investigation is complete to the Missionaries of Charity as a whole, and to the Vatican. Publishing them now certainly violated the spirit of what Mother Teresa would have wanted.
Create your own visitor map